Hells Angels/Air America/Skulln'Bones/CIA all one and the same thugs

gornk

2006-12-29 18:28:28 UTC

Ok, I apologize for the dead links, I have found the proper links, I
must have made an error in originally posting them. Here they are:

http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2005/10/02/us_car_theft_rings_probed_for_ties_to_iraq_bombings/

US car theft rings probed for ties to Iraq bombings
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff | October 2, 2005

WASHINGTON -- The FBI's counterterrorism unit has launched a broad
investigation of US-based theft rings after discovering that some of
the vehicles used in deadly car bombings in Iraq, including attacks
that killed US troops and Iraqi civilians, were probably stolen in the
United States, according to senior government officials.
****

http://www.canada.com/cityguides/ottawa/story.html?id=13c12fce-50fc-4934-aeb7-f98466916013&k=51256

These same bikers, once hunted down by the Hells Angels during the
Quebec war, have since joined the rival gang, Hells Angels, doing
business in Ottawa.
Though the elite chapter's lucrative business is based in Ottawa's
francophone community, with more than two dozen associates taking care
of street-level dealings, its members are spread across the region.
Police have accused them of drug trafficking, money laundering,
prostitution, car-theft operations, and extortion.
Some members of the Ottawa chapter, one of the most powerful units in
the country, include:
- Paul (Sasquatch) Porter. Born in 1963, the president of Ontario
Nomads was an original member of Rock Machine, since absorbed by
Bandidos. Intelligent and known for keeping a low profile, Mr. Porter
has survived two attempts on his life. He is awaiting trial on charges
of masterminding an international car-theft ring targeting luxury SUVs,

which were later sold around the world, according to Quebec police.
**
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=KEE20...

Were British Special Forces Soldiers Planting Bombs in Basra?
Suspicions Strengthened by Earlier Reports

by Michael Keefer

Global Research, September 25, 2005

Email this article to a friend
Print this article

Does anyone remember the shock with which the British public greeted
the revelation four years ago that one of the members of the Real IRA
unit whose bombing attack in Omagh on August 15, 1998 killed
twenty-nine civilians had been a double agent, a British army soldier?

That soldier was not Britain's only terrorist double agent. A second
British soldier planted within the IRA claimed he had given forty-eight

hours advance notice of the Omagh car-bomb attack to his handlers
within the Royal Ulster Constabulary, including "details of one of the
bombing team and the man's car registration." Although the agent had
made an audio tape of his tip-off call, Sir Ronnie Flanagan, chief
constable of the RUC, declared that "no such information was received"
(http://www.sundayherald.com/17827).

This second double agent went public in June 2002 with the claim that
from 1981 to 1994, while on full British army pay, he had worked for
"the Force Research Unit, an ultra-secret wing of British military
intelligence," as an IRA mole. With the full knowledge and consent of
his FRU and MI5 handlers, he became a bombing specialist who "mixed
explosive and ... helped to develop new types of bombs," including
"light-sensitive bombs, activated by photographic flashes, to overcome
the problem of IRA remote-control devices having their signal jammed by

army radio units." He went on to become "a member of the Provisional
IRA's 'internal security squad'-also known as the 'torture
unit'-which interrogated and executed suspected informers"
(http://www.sundayherald.com/print25646).

The much-feared commander of that same "torture unit" was likewise a
mole, who had previously served in the Royal Marines' Special Boat
Squadron (an elite special forces unit, the Marines' equivalent to
the better-known SAS). A fourth mole, a soldier code-named "Stakeknife"

whose military handlers "allowed him to carry out large numbers of
terrorist murders in order to protect his cover within the IRA," was
still active in December 2002 as "one of Belfast's leading
Provisionals" (http://www.sundayherald.com/29997).

Reliable evidence also emerged in late 2002 that the British army had
been using its double agents in terrorist organizations "to carry out
proxy assassinations for the British state"-most notoriously in the
case of Belfast solicitor and human rights activist Pat Finucane, who
was murdered in 1989 by the Protestant Ulster Defence Association. It
appears that the FRU passed on details about Finucane to a British
soldier who had infiltrated the UDA; he in turn "supplied UDA murder
teams with the information" (http://www.sundayherald.com/29997).

Recent events in Basra have raised suspicions that the British army may

have reactivated these same tactics in Iraq.

Articles published by Michel Chossudovsky, Larry Chin and Mike Whitney
at the Centre for Research on Globalization's website on September
20, 2005 have offered preliminary assessments of the claims of Iraqi
authorities that two British soldiers in civilian clothes who were
arrested by Iraqi police in Basra on September 19-and in short order
released by a British tank and helicopter assault on the prison where
they were being held-had been engaged in planting bombs in the city

See:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20050...

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHI20...

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=WHI20...

A further article by Kurt Nimmo points to false-flag operations carried

out by British special forces troops in Northern Ireland and elsewhere,

and to Donald Rumsfeld's formation of the P2OG, or Proactive
Preemptive Operations Group, as directly relevant to Iraqi charges of
possible false-flag terror operations by the occupying powers in Iraq
(http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20050...).

These accusations by Iraqi officials echo insistent but unsubstantiated

claims, going back at least to the spring of 2004, to the effect that
many of the terror bombings carried out against civilian targets in
Iraq have actually been perpetrated by U.S. and British forces rather
than by Iraqi insurgents.

Some such claims can be briskly dismissed. In mid-May 2005, for
example, a group calling itself "Al Qaeda in Iraq" accused U.S. troops
"of detonating car bombs and falsely accusing militants"
(http://siteinstitute.org/bin/articles.cgi?ID=publications45605&Catego...).

For even the most credulous, this could at best be a case of the pot
calling the kettle soot-stained. But it's not clear why anyone would
want to believe this claim, coming as it does from a group or
groupuscule purportedly led by the wholly mythical al-Zarqawi-and one
whose very name affiliates it with terror bombers. These people, if
they exist, might themselves have good reason to blame their own crimes

on others.

Other claims, however, are cumulatively more troubling.

The American journalist Dahr Jamail wrote in April 20, 2004 that the
recent spate of car bombings in Baghdad was widely rumoured to have
been the work of the CIA:

"The word on the street in Baghdad is that the cessation of suicide car

bombings is proof that the CIA was behind them. Why? Because as one man

states, '[CIA agents are] too busy fighting now, and the unrest they
wanted to cause by the bombings is now upon them.' True or not, it
doesn't bode well for the occupiers' image in Iraq."
(http://www.countercurrents.org/iraq-jamail200404.htm)

Two days later, on April 22, 2004, Agence France-Presse reported that
five car-bombings in Basra-three near-simultaneous attacks outside
police stations in Basra that killed sixty-eight people, including
twenty children, and two follow-up bombings-were being blamed by
supporters of Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr on the British. While eight

hundred supporters demonstrated outside Sadr's offices, a Sadr
spokesman claimed to have "evidence that the British were involved in
these attacks" (http://www.inq7.net/wnw/2004/apr/23/wnw_3_1.htm).

An anonymous senior military officer said on April 22, 2004 of these
Basra attacks that "It looks like Al-Qaeda. It's got all the
hallmarks: it was suicidal, it was spectacular and it was symbolic."
Brigadier General Nick Carter, commander of the British garrison in
Basra, stated more ambiguously that Al Qaeda was not necessarily to
blame for the five bombings, but that those responsible came from
outside Basra and "quite possibly" from outside Iraq: "'All that we
can be certain of is that this is something that came from outside,'
Carter said" (http://www.inq7.net/wnw/2004/apr/23/wnw_4_1.htm). Moqtada

al-Sadr's supporters of course believed exactly the same
thing-differing only in their identification of the criminal
outsiders as British agents rather than as Islamist mujaheddin from
other Arab countries.

In May 2005 'Riverbend', the Baghdad author of the widely-read blog
Baghdad Burning, reported that what the international press was
reporting as suicide bombings were often in fact "car bombs that are
either being remotely detonated or maybe time bombs." After one of the
larger recent blasts, which occurred in the middle-class Ma'moun area
of west Baghdad, a man living in a house in front of the blast site was

reportedly arrested for having sniped an Iraqi National Guardsman. But
according to 'Riverbend', his neighbours had a different story:

"People from the area claim that the man was taken away not because he
shot anyone, but because he knew too much about the bomb. Rumor has it
that he saw an American patrol passing through the area and pausing at
the bomb site minutes before the explosion. Soon after they drove away,

the bomb went off and chaos ensued. He ran out of his house screaming
to the neighbors and bystanders that the Americans had either planted
the bomb or seen the bomb and done nothing about it. He was promptly
taken away."

(http://riverbendblog.blogspit.com/2005_05_01_riverbendblog_archive.ht...)

Also in May 2005, Imad Khadduri, the Iraqi-exile physicist whose
writings helped to discredit American and British fabrications about
weapons of mass destruction, reported a story that in Baghdad a driver
whose license had been confiscated at an American check-point was told
"to report to an American military camp near Baghdad airport for
interrogation and in order to retrieve his license." After being
questioned for half an hour, he was informed that there was nothing
against him, but that his license had been forwarded to the Iraqi
police at the al-Khadimiya station "for processing"-and that he
should get there quickly before the lieutenant whose name he was given
went off his shift.

"The driver did leave in a hurry, but was soon alarmed with a feeling
that his car was driving as if carrying a heavy load, and he also
became suspicious of a low flying helicopter that kept hovering
overhead, as if trailing him. He stopped the car and inspected it
carefully. He found nearly 100 kilograms of explosives hidden in the
back seat and along the two back doors. The only feasible explanation
for this incident is that the car was indeed booby trapped by the
Americans and intended for the al-Khadimiya Shiite district of Baghdad.

The helicopter was monitoring his movement and witnessing the
anticipated 'hideous attack by foreign elements'."

(http://www.albasrah.net/maqalat/english/0505/Combat-terrorism_160505.htm)

According to Khadduri, "The same scenario was repeated in Mosul, in the

north of Iraq." On this occasion, the driver's life was saved when
his car broke down on the way to the police station where he was
supposed to reclaim his license, and when the mechanic to whom he had
recourse "discovered that the spare tire was fully laden with
explosives."

Khadduri mentions, as deserving of investigation, a "perhaps unrelated
incident" in Baghdad on April 28, 2005 in which a Canadian truck-driver

with dual Canadian-Iraqi citizenship was killed. He quotes a CBC report

according to which "Some media cited unidentified sources who said he
may have died after U.S. forces 'tracked' a target, using a
helicopter gunship, but Foreign Affairs said it's still investigating
conflicting reports of the death. U. S. officials have denied any
involvement."

Another incident, also from April 2005, calls more urgently for
investigation, since one of its victims remains alive. Abdul Amir
Younes, a CBS cameraman, was lightly wounded by U.S. forces on April 5
"while filming the aftermath of a car bombing in Mosul." American
military authorities were initially apologetic about his injuries, but
three days later arrested him on the grounds that he had been "engaged
in anti-coalition activity"
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/Kafka-does-iraq-the-...).

Arianna Huffington, in her detailed account of this case, quite rightly

emphasizes its Kafkaesque qualities: Younes has now been detained, in
Abu Graib and elsewhere, for more than five months-without charges,
without any hint of what evidence the Pentagon may hold against him,
and without any indication that he will ever be permitted to stand
trial, challenge that evidence, and disprove the charges that might at
some future moment be laid. But in addition to confirming, yet again,
the Pentagon's willingness to violate the most fundamental principles
of humane and democratic jurisprudence, this case also raises a further

question. Was Younes perhaps arrested, like the Iraqi whose rumoured
fate was mentioned by 'Riverbend', because he had seen-and in
Younes' case photographed-more than was good for him?

Agents provocateurs?

Spokesmen for the American and British occupation of Iraq, together
with newspapers like the Daily Telegraph, have of course rejected with
indignation any suggestion that their forces could have been involved
in false-flag terrorist operations in Iraq.

It may be remembered that during the 1980s spokesmen for the government

of Ronald Reagan likewise heaped ridicule on Nicaraguan accusations
that the U.S. was illegally supplying weapons to the
'Contras'-until, that is, a CIA-operated C-123 cargo aircraft
full of weaponry was shot down over Nicaragua, and Eugene Hasenfus, a
cargo handler who survived the crash, testified that his supervisors
(one of whom was Luis Posada Carriles, the CIA agent responsible for
the 1976 bombing of a Cuban civilian airliner) were working for
then-Vice-President George H. W. Bush.

The arrest-and the urgent liberation-of the two undercover British
soldiers in Iraq might in a similar manner be interpreted as casting a
retrospective light on previously unsubstantiated claims about the
involvement of members of the occupying armies in terrorist bombing
attacks on civilians.

The parallel is far from exact: in this case there has been no dramatic

confession like that of Hasenfus, and there are no directly
incriminating documents like the pilot's log of the downed C-123.
There is, moreover, a marked lack of consensus as to what actually
happened in Basra. Should we therefore, with Juan Cole, dismiss the
possibility British soldiers were acting as agents provocateurs as a
"theory [that] has almost no facts behind it"
(http://www.juancole.com)?

Members of Britain's Elite SAS Forces

It appears that when on September 19 suspicious Iraqi police stopped
the Toyota Cressida the undercover British soldiers were driving, the
two men opened fire, killing one policeman and wounding another. But
the soldiers, identified by the BBC as "members of the SAS elite
special forces" (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4264614.stm),
were subdued by the police and arrested. A report published by The
Guardian on September 24 adds the further detail that the SAS men "are
thought to have been on a surveillance mission outside a police station

in Basra when they were challenged by an Iraqi police patrol"
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/iraq/Story/0,2763,1577575,00.html).

As Justin Raimondo has observed in an article published on September 23

at Antiwar.com, nearly every other aspect of this episode is disputed.

The Washington Post dismissively remarked, in the eighteenth paragraph
of its report on these events, that "Iraqi security officials variously

accused the two Britons they detained of shooting at Iraqi forces or
trying to plant explosives"
(http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/09/20/MNGSSE...).

Iraqi officials in fact accused them not of one or the other act, but
of both.

Fattah al-Shaykh, a member of the Iraqi National Assembly, told
Al-Jazeera TV on September 19 that the soldiers opened fire when the
police sought to arrest them, and that their car was booby-trapped "and

was meant to explode in the centre of the city of Basra in the popular
market" (quoted by Chossudovsky). A deliberately inflammatory press
release sent out on the same day by the office of Moqtada al-Sadr (and
posted in English translation at Juan Cole's Informed Comment blog on
September 20) states that the soldiers' arrest was prompted by their
having "opened fire on passers-by" near a Basra mosque, and that they
were found to have "in their possession explosives and remote-control
devices, as well as light and medium weapons and other accessories"
(http://www.juancole.com).

What credence can be given to the claim about explosives? Justin
Raimondo writes that while initial BBC Radio reports acknowledged that
the two men indeed had explosives in their car, subsequent reports from

the same source indicated that the Iraqi police found nothing beyond
"assault rifles, a light machine gun, an anti-tank weapon, radio gear,
and medical kit. This is thought to be standard kit for the SAS
operating in such a theater of operations"
(http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=7366).

One might well wonder, with Raimondo, whether an anti-tank weapon is
"standard operating equipment"-or what use SAS men on "a surveillance
mission outside a police station" intended to make of it. But more
importantly, a photograph published by the Iraqi police and distributed

by Reuters shows that-unless the equipment is a plant-the SAS men
were carrying a good deal more than just the items acknowledged by the
BBC.
(http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20050...)

I would want the opinion of an arms expert before risking a definitive
judgment about the objects shown, which could easily have filled the
trunk and much of the back seat of a Cressida. But this photograph
makes plausible the statement of Sheik Hassan al-Zarqani, a spokesman
for Al-Sadr's Mahdi Army militia:

"What our police found in their car was very disturbing-weapons,
explosives, and a remote control detonator. These are the weapons of
terrorists. We believe these soldiers were planning an attack on a
market or other civilian targets..." (quoted by Raimondo)

The fierce determination of the British army to remove these men from
any danger of interrogation by their own supposed allies in the
government the British are propping up-even when their rescue
entailed the destruction of an Iraqi prison and the release of a large
number of prisoners, gun-battles with Iraqi police and with Al-Sadr's
Mahdi Army militia, a large popular mobilization against the British
occupying force, and a subsequent withdrawal of any cooperation on the
part of the regional government-tends, if anything, to support the
view that this episode involved something much darker and more serious
than a mere flare-up of bad tempers at a check-point.

US-UK Sponsored Civil War

There is reason to believe, moreover, that the open civil war which
car-bomb attacks on civilians seem intended to produce would not be an
unwelcome development in the eyes of the occupation forces.

Writers in the English-language corporate media have repeatedly noted
that recent terror-bomb attacks which have caused massive casualties
among civilians appear to be pushing Iraq towards a civil war of Sunnis

against Shiites, and of Kurds against both. For example, on September
18, 2005 Peter Beaumont proposed in The Observer that the slaughter of
civilians, which he ascribes to Al Qaeda alone, "has one aim: civil
war"
(http://observer.guardian.co.uk/focus/story/0,6903,1572936,00.html).
But H. D. S. Greenway had already suggested on June 17, 2005 in the
Boston Globe that "Given the large number of Sunni-led attacks against
Shia targets, the emerging Shia-led attacks against Sunnis, and the
extralegal abductions of Arabs by Kurdish authorities in Kirkut, one
has to wonder whether the long-feared Iraqi civil war hasn't already
begun"
(http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2005...).

And on September 21, 2005 Nancy Youssef and Mohammed al Dulaimy of the
Knight Ridder Washington Bureau wrote that the ethnic cleansing of
Shiites in predominantly Sunni Baghdad neighbourhoods "is proceeding at

an alarming and potentially destabilizing pace," and quoted the
despairing view of an Iraqi expert:

"'Civil war today is closer than any time before,' said Hazim Abdel
Hamid al Nuaimi, a professor of politics at al-Mustansiriya University
in Baghdad. 'All of these explosions, the efforts by police and
purging of neighbourhoods is a battle to control Baghdad.'"

(http://www.realcities.com/mid/krwashington/12704935.htm)

Whether or not it has already begun or will occur, the eruption of a
full-blown civil war, leading to the fragmentation of the country,
would clearly be welcomed in some circles. Israeli strategists and
journalists proposed as long ago as 1982 that one of their country's
strategic goals should be the partitioning of Iraq into a Shiite state,

a Sunni state, and a separate Kurdish part. (See foreign ministry
official Oded Yinon's "A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s," Kivunim
14 [February 1982]; a similar proposal put forward by Ze'ev Schiff in
Ha'aretz in the same month is noted by Noam Chomsky in Fateful
Triangle [2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 1999], p. 457).

A partitioning of Iraq into sections defined by ethnicity and by
Sunni-Shia differences would entail, obviously enough, both civil war
and ethnic cleansing on a massive scale. But these considerations did
not deter Leslie H. Gelb from advocating in the New York Times, on
November 25, 2003, what he called "The Three-State Solution".
(http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/iraq/three.htm).

Gelb, a former senior State Department and Pentagon official, a former
editor and columnist for the New York Times, and president emeritus of
the Council on Foreign Relations, is an insider's insider. And if the
essays of Yinon and Schiff are nasty stuff, especially in the context
of Israel's 1981 bombing attack on Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor,
there is still some difference between speculatively proposing the
dismemberment of a powerful neighbouring country, and actively
advocating the dismemberment of a country that one's own nation has
conquered in a war of unprovoked aggression. The former might be
described as a diseased imagining of war and criminality; the latter
belongs very clearly to the category of war crimes.

Gelb's essay proposes punishing the Sunni-led insurgency by
separating the largely Sunni centre of present-day Iraq from the
oil-rich Kurdish north and the oil-rich Shia south. It holds out the
dismembering of the Yugoslav federation in the 1990s (with the
appalling slaughters that ensued) as a "hopeful precedent."

Gelb's essay has been widely interpreted as signaling the intentions
of a dominant faction in the U.S. government. It has also, very
appropriately, been denounced by Bill Vann as openly promoting "a war
crime of world-historic proportions"
(http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/nov2003/gelb-n26.shtml).

Given the increasing desperation of the American and British
governments in the face of an insurgency that their tactics of mass
arbitrary arrest and torture, Phoenix-Program or "Salvadoran-option"
death squads, unrestrained use of overwhelming military force, and
murderous collective punishment have failed to suppress, it comes as no

surprise that in recent military actions such as the assault on Tal
Afar the U.S. army has been deploying Kurdish peshmerga troops and
Shiite militias in a manner that seems designed to inflame ethnic
hatreds.

No one, I should hope, is surprised any longer by the fact that Abu
Musab al-Zarqawi-that fictional construct of the Pentagon's serried
ranks of little Tom Clancies, that one-legged Dalek, that Scarlet
Pimpernel of terrorism, who manages to be here, there, and everywhere
at once-should be so ferociously devoted to the terrorizing and
extermination of his Shiite co-religionists.

Should we be any more surprised, then, to see evidence emerging in Iraq

of false-flag terrorist bombings conducted by the major occupying
powers? The secret services and special forces of both the U.S. and
Britain have, after all, had some experience in these matters.

Global Research Contributing Editor Michael Keefer is Associate
Professor of English at the University of Guelph. He is a former
President of the Association of Canadian College and University
Teachers of English. His most recent writings include a series of
articles on electoral fraud in the 2004 US presidential election
published by the Centre for Research on Globalization

Post by gornk
Fair enough,
What is happening here is that the CIA special forces unit is bombing
American troops and Iraqi civilians in order to extend the war. They
are using stolen American and Canadian vehicles for these car-bomb
attacks on allied targets.
There are at least two incidents where Americans and Britons have been
actually caught dressed as Arabs while carrying out these bombing
operations,
and this is the tip of the iceberg.
The Hells Angels are obtaining (stealing) the vehicles used in these
attacks and shipping them overseas via west coast shipping ports. The
Hells Angels are nothing more than an extension of George H. Bush's
Skull n' Bones narcotics-smuggling cartel. The Hells Angels were
originally formed by former WWII/Korean War and Vietnam War vets ( a
high % CIA
AIr America pilots/paratroopers/nternational drug and gun smugglers).
They named themselves Hells Angels because it is a term that reaches
all the way back to elite WWI mercenary paratroopers, the 'for hire'
covert operations assassins and terrorists known as Hells Angels who
carried out illegal kidnappings, interrogations, tortures,
assassinations, and numerous terrorist atrocities on behalf of the U.S.
government. Howard Hughes made the film Hells Angels about WWI-era
fighter squadrons and named it after them. The Hells Angels have
always been a conduit for the street
drugs that the Skull n' Bones/CIA international narcotics trafficking
network fly or ship into the United States and Canada.
Now we find that this same network is supplying the vehicles used by
covert forces in car-bomb attacks against U.S. troops. Mercenary
special forces units are attacking key American and allied strongholds
in Iraq with car bombs while dressed as Arabs. Hells Angels. The Iraq
and Afghanistan wars are all about Bush and his narcotics cartel moving
opium, cocaine, and weapons around the world and killing as many people
as possible in the process.
You have to understand one thing about Skull n' Bones/Hells Angels.
They are occult Globalists. They hold no allegiance to any one nation.
They are satanic elitists, and they feel that they are smarter than the
rest of us, and that their evil is beneficial to the world, because the
wealth that they accrue 'strengthens their superior genes as a gift to
humanity' etc., and the large number of people that they kill are
eliminated
as a service to the ecology of the planet/gene pool blah blah blah.
They are nothing but a bunch of murderous, greedy scumbags who have
latched onto all sorts of occult new-age bullshit to make them feel
good about what they are.
http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2005/10/02/us_car_theft_rin...
WASHINGTON -- The FBI's counterterrorism unit has launched a broad
investigation of US-based theft rings after discovering that some of
the vehicles used in deadly car bombings in Iraq, including attacks
that killed US troops and Iraqi civilians, were probably stolen in the
United States, according to senior government officials.
John E. Lewis, deputy assistant director of the FBI for
counterterrorism, told the Globe that the investigation hasn't yielded
any evidence that the vehicles were stolen specifically for car
bombings. But there is evidence, he said, that the cars were smuggled
from the United States as part of a widespread criminal network that
includes terrorists and insurgents.
Cracking the car theft rings and tracing the cars could help identify
the leaders of insurgent forces in Iraq and shut down at least one of
the means they use to attack the US-led coalition and the Iraqi
government, the officials said.
The inquiry began after coalition troops raided a bomb-making factory
in Fallujah last November and found a sport utility vehicle registered
in Texas that was being prepared for a bombing mission.
Investigators said they are comparing several other cases where
vehicles evidently stolen in the United States wound up in Syria or
other Middle East countries and ultimately into the hands of Iraqi
insurgent groups -- including Al Qaeda in Iraq, led by Jordanian-born
Abu Musab Al Zarqawi.
Citing the sensitive nature of the ongoing inquiry, investigators
wouldn't say how many specific cases they have found, and FBI spokesman
Edwin Cogswell in Washington did not respond to repeated requests for
comment.
But Lewis said the origins of the vehicles in question were unearthed
by tracing the vehicle identification numbers, or VINs -- a standard
production marker stamped on during manufacture -- as well as through
other forensic tools such as auto parts. Some of the automobiles can be
easily identified, specialists said, while others have had their VINs
ground down or have been fitted with fake ones.
----------------
Reports of secret U.S. govt. operations featuring special forces
operatives disguised as arabs
http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/66432
Iraqis apprehend two Americans disguised as Arabs trying to detonate a
car bomb in a residential neighborhood of western Baghdad.
A number of Iraqis apprehended two Americans disguised in Arab dress as
they tried to blow up a booby-trapped car in the middle of a
residential area in western Baghdad on Tuesday.
Residents of western Baghdad's al-Ghazaliyah district told Quds Press
that the people had apprehended the Americans as they left their
Caprice car near a residential neighborhood in al-Ghazaliyah on Tuesday
afternoon (11 October 2005). Local people found they looked suspicious
so they detained the men before they could get away. That was when they
discovered that they were Americans and called the Iraqi police.
Five minutes after the arrival of the Iraqi police on the scene, a
large force of US troops showed up and surrounded the area. They put
the two Americans in one of their Humvees and drove away at high speed
to the astonishment of the residents of the area.
Quds Press spoke by telephone with a member of the al-Ghazaliyah puppet
police who confirmed the incident, saying that the two men were
non-Arab foreigners but declined to be more precise about their
nationality.
Quds Press pointed out that about a month ago, the Iraqi police in the
southern Iraqi city of al-Basrah arrested two Britons whom they accused
of attempting to cause an explosion in the city. The Britons were taken
into custody by the Iraqi police only to be broken out of prison by an
assault of British occupation troops. That incident has created a tense
relationship between the British and the local authorities in
al-Basrah, Quds Press noted.
----------------
http://www.hells-angels.cz/hamc/images/main_logo.gif
http://www.canada.com/cityguides/ottawa/story.html?id=13c12fce-50fc-4...
These same bikers, once hunted down by the Hells Angels during the
Quebec war, have since joined the rival gang, Hells Angels, doing
business in Ottawa.
Though the elite chapter's lucrative business is based in Ottawa's
francophone community, with more than two dozen associates taking care
of street-level dealings, its members are spread across the region.
Police have accused them of drug trafficking, money laundering,
prostitution, car-theft operations, and extortion.
Some members of the Ottawa chapter, one of the most powerful units in
- Paul (Sasquatch) Porter. Born in 1963, the president of Ontario
Nomads was an original member of Rock Machine, since absorbed by
Bandidos. Intelligent and known for keeping a low profile, Mr. Porter
has survived two attempts on his life. He is awaiting trial on charges
of masterminding an international car-theft ring targeting luxury SUVs,
which were later sold around the world, according to Quebec police.
-------------------------
So, looks like we have a situation where the CIA does not want an end
to violence. They want things to escalate in Iraq, and they want more
dead U.S. soldiers coming home. They know that if there are no American
casualties in Iraq, the Americans will look like bullies, and
furthermore, there will seem to be no reason to stay there. They are
creating the illusion of fierce resistance by bombing their own troops.
Pathetic , the Americans even have to supply the vehicles used in these
attacks.
more on this in the Terrorstorm video by Alex Jones. (google video)
------------------

Zero evidence. None of the HA are Yale or even Harvard or Stanford men
not even UBC or Queens University.

------
I said they were an extension, ie: closely associated. I have never
said the HA are direct Skull n' Bones members. I have said that they
are closely associated
via their history of involvement in covert CIA war and drug
operations. If you
have any doubts about CIA involvement in drugs watch the Clinton
Chronicles or
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=5758127109364967697&q=CIA+drugs
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-8681225708920427234&q=CIA+drugs

Post by gornk
They named themselves Hells Angels because it is a term that reaches
all the way back to elite WWI mercenary paratroopers,

-----------

Paratroopers in WW1?? Wrong. They took the name from the WW2 bomber
group of the same name and the Howard Hughes movie of the same name.

wrong: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hell%27s_Angels_%28film%29
the film Hells Angels was made before WWII, in 1929-30
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hells_Angels
So, the term Hells Angels has been around a lot longer than you think
and prior to WWII. It is from WWI.
Hughes named his 1929 film 'Hells Angels' after the term for covert
mercenary soldiers and paratroopers known as Hells Angels, operatives
who would do anything for money, including torture, murder,
assassinations, and terrorism. These WWI-era Hells Angels preceded the
creation of the CIA , which was created after WWII. The predecessor
organization which created the CIA was the Skull n' Bones society,
founded by the wealthy Russel international opium syndicate family.

Post by gornk
The Hells Angels have always been a conduit for the street
drugs that the Skull n' Bones/CIA international narcotics trafficking
network fly or ship into the United States and
Canada.

------

The early Hell's Angels were lucky to have a joint to smoke.

-----
Wrong. The Hells Angels (not the HA bikers, the HA mercenary soldiers)
have always been covert -network associates of Skull n' Bones, and
later the CIA, which has
its origins in the Russel family's opium fortune. Skull n' Bones was
founded by drug smugglers. Skull n' Bones founded the CIA. The CIA's
' Air
America' fleet of airplanes is staffed by coke-heads and smack
addicts. (see film
'Air America' starring Mel Gibson, set in Cambodia during 'Nam,
depicting CIA drug and gun
smuggling in SE Asia.)
These are the REAL Hells Angels (not HA bikers, but HA mercenary
soldiers). Air America operates to this very day, worldwide, and
primarily today in Afghanistan's opium fields and South America's
cocaine mills. The wars are extended to move drugs and weapons and
money
around the world, and of course to kill as many people as possible.
This is an occult
death matrix who view mass death not as an unfortunate byproduct of
their greed,
but as another valuable, beneficial PRODUCT of it. They view humanity
outside their circles
as an inferior, cancerous growth on their earthly paradise. These are
elitist psychopaths.

Post by gornk
Now we find that this same network is supplying the vehicles
used by covert forces in car-bomb attacks against U.S. troops.
Mercenary special forces units attacking key American and allied
strongholds in Iraq with car bombs. Hells Angels.

-----

There are no Hell's Angels in the Middle East.

Wrong. Air AMerica is active in Afghanistan, and Air America is part of
the same covert network. (Of course I am not referring to leather-clad
HA bikers
cruising around Afghanistan with horns attached to their helmets). I
mean Hells
Angels in its original form: the mercenary soldiers and drug
running/gun trading operatives who staff Air America . So yes, there
are Hells Angels in Afghanistan, and they work for the Skull n'
Bones/CIA underworld.
All of these terms tend to get confusing (Hells Angels, Air America,
Skull n' Bones, CIA), but they are really all terms for one and the
same global drug/gun/war operation.

I think we can agree that the Hell's Angels should be banned as a
terrorist org and that its members, associattes, friends and
hangarounds and business agents should recieve 20 year prison sentences
for gangsterism if not die. As for them feeling good about themselves
they are known to use large numbers of psychotropic medications just to
function as well as pot, alcohol, cocaine, meth etc. Bush Sr of course
had to use psychiatric medication just to function whether his son does
I don't know. Some of the most unhappy stressed out ppl you will ever
meet are HA gang members not that some don't have a lot of bonhommie.

They are addicts. THis is how they are controlled and manipulated by
the system/network. It is very difficult for them to leave the system,
because they are not only addicted to the narcotics, but they are under
intense pressure and
in grave danger because of what they know. The reason that so many
drug-addicted hookers wind up murdered is because a lot of them find
out about this in their
daily course of dealings with drug pushers/bikers/crooked
cops/intelligence people. They are
being shut up.
If you think the HA will ever be outlawed, forget it. They work for
the federal government. (a lot of them, not all, the organization
itself)
-----
If you want to KNOW something about the CIA and Air America,
watch this video: (about 40:00 minute mark gets into Loas/Cambodia and
Air America.)
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-2562011283313707032&q=secrets...
-----------
In honor of the high satanic holiday of Dec. 25, I present to you the
following information
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4946110250157218995&q=conspir...
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-82095917705734983&q=dark+secrets
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=3251077391435895140&q=clinton+...
I
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8150571337669145794&q=Skull+a...
II
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4041353527945758202&q=Skull+a...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=786048453686176230&q=Terrorstorm